CMM.X State Infrastructure PUBLIC
LIVEVERIFY
CLAIM BOUNDARY predictive_claim = NONE Diagnostic + verification + history layer. predictive_claim = NONE. No edge, no alpha, no direction, no trading signal. Under prospective test.
Sources3 Newest value60 min described moment Oldest value60 min described moment Without timestamp0 Page refreshesevery 20 s
Tip75473 PhaseNORMAL Coherence0.568 P(large move)0.0470

The model's own verdict on itself: WORSE_THAN_PERSISTENCE

It predicts the next state worse than simply assuming the state stays the same. This is not a caveat we added — it is the number the system computes about itself, every minute, and it is published because it is measured.

model accuracy 2869 / 10000 · 28.7 %

Baseline (always the majority class): 0.5325. Lower is worse.

advantage provenNO

Where it comes from, where it is, how near the next event is

last regime shift2026-09-04T12:00Z · -2.25 %
now2026-09-11T03:57Z · 76835.7
in syncYES
sync wave phaseTRANSITION (slope)
proximity to next shift0.035 (4h)
out-of-sample AUC0.6877

This layer states TIMING and PROXIMITY to the next regime shift. It states no direction — a shift is a large move, up or down is not part of the measure. Provenance warning, measured: the fields in this block do not all come from the same model. The probability and the timeframe come from the per-timeframe risk gate; the AUC comes from a separate precision model with a one-bar horizon. Both are shown elsewhere on this site; neither is suppressed, and they are not merged into one number here.

Measured just now: the two disagree on the warning level — the risk gate reads CALM on 4h, the precision model reads LOW. cmmx_orientation.json:wohin.warnung · cmmx_unified_state.json:transition_warning.level

Two models, two warning levelsat the same instant the per-timeframe risk gate reads CALM on 4h, while the precision model reads LOW on a one-bar horizon. That is not an error in either — they measure different scales. It is shown because a single "warning level" would have to pick one and hide the other.

Segment geometry

transition points6142
sign autocorrelation (lag 1)0.017
flip rate0.491
magnitude autocorrelation0.100
duration autocorrelation0.226

A sign autocorrelation near zero with a flip rate near one half means no direction is inferable from the previous segment. Magnitude and duration carry a little structure, the sign carries none. The system publishes this against its own interest.

Point order

self_excitation_x2.700
powerlaw_alpha_mle3.483
powerlaw_ks0.046
powerlaw_favoredpower-law
interarrival_cv1.912
bars_since_last15.000
in_excited_windowNO

Information clock

stateMEDIUM
expected activity vs daily average0.928×
peak hour (UTC)14
trough hour (UTC)4
confirmed out of sampleYES

Deliberately withheld

ArtefactReason
cmmx_future_distribution.jsonPRE_GATE_FORECAST_LAYER
cmmx_guidance_scorecard.jsonPRE_GATE_FORECAST_LAYER

Both artefacts exist, are live, and are not shown. They belong to the forecast layer, which has not passed its gate; neither carries the flag by which the other artefacts declare themselves free of a price claim. Omitting them silently would be the same failure as a silent status change — so the omission is stated.

Provenance

unified2026-09-11T03:59:19Z 60 min described moment
orientation2026-09-11T03:58:36Z 60 min described moment
transition2026-09-11T03:55:32Z 60 min described moment
next question What is this state made of? The position above comes from bounded measures. Whether those measures are even distinct from one another is a separate question — and it is measured.